Engineering the Post-Quantum Transition at Scale: Protocol Integration, Library Defaults, and the In-Between Era of Internet Security (2025)
Keywords:
post-quantum cryptography, ML-KEM, TLS 1.3, OpenSSL 3.5, hybrid key exchange, HQC, FN-DSA, PKI migration, digital trustAbstract
Background: The August 2024 finalization of FIPS 203, 204, and 205 established the cryptographic core of the post-quantum transition; 2025 was the year that core was engineered into the default path of the Internet . Within twelve months, ML-KEM-based hybrid key exchange became a default, zero-configuration behavior across the major browser engines, a mainstream language runtime (Go 1.24's crypto/mlkem standard-library package), and — decisively for server operators — OpenSSL 3.5.0 (April 2025, LTS), whose default TLS keyshares offer X25519MLKEM768. By late October 2025, more than half of human-initiated traffic observed at a major CDN was post-quantum protected. Objective: This paper characterizes the 2025 state of the post-quantum transition as an engineering achievement, and identifies what the achievement does not yet cover. Methods: Following a design-analytical methodology, we (i) verify the 2025 default-enablement sequence against primary release documentation (OpenSSL, Go, browser engines, platform vendors, CDN telemetry), (ii) analyze the standards pipeline as it stood at year-end (the HQC selection of March 2025; the pending FN-DSA draft; the IR 8547 deprecation schedule), and (iii) construct a residual-risk register mapping six risk classes against six mitigation classes. Results: The deployment achievement is real but asymmetric: confidentiality (key establishment) has moved to post-quantum hybrids at scale, while authentication remains entirely classical — public post-quantum certificates are not expected to be widely issued before 2026 and broadly trusted later. We term this the in-between era and show that it closes the harvest-now-decrypt-later window for transit confidentiality while leaving an open window for identity forgery and server impersonation. The residual-risk register identifies implementation maturity (the KyberSlash-class timing-defect lesson), certificate and PKI latency, and the non-upgradeable long-tail client population as the dominant open risks. Conclusions: The engineering problem of 2025 was enabling post-quantum key exchange by default; the engineering problem of 2026–2027 is post-quantum authentication on the same schedule — and organizations should plan PKI re-issuance, validation pipelines, and legacy-exception registers against that window now.
References
1. National Institute of Standards and Technology, "Module-Lattice-Based Key-Encapsulation Mechanism Standard," FIPS 203, U.S. Dept. of Commerce, Aug. 2024. doi: 10.6028/NIST.FIPS.203.
2. National Institute of Standards and Technology, "Module-Lattice-Based Digital Signature Standard," FIPS 204, U.S. Dept. of Commerce, Aug. 2024. doi: 10.6028/NIST.FIPS.204.
3. National Institute of Standards and Technology, "Stateless Hash-Based Digital Signature Standard," FIPS 205, U.S. Dept. of Commerce, Aug. 2024. doi: 10.6028/NIST.FIPS.205.
4. D. Cooper, D. Apon, Q. Dang, M. Davidson, W. Dworkin, and C. Miller, "Transition to Post-Quantum Cryptography Standards," NIST IR 8547 (Initial Public Draft), Nov. 2024. doi: 10.6028/NIST.IR.8547.ipd.
5. National Institute of Standards and Technology, "NIST Selects HQC as Fifth Algorithm for Post-Quantum Encryption," Mar. 11, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.nist.gov/news-events/news/2025/03/nist-selects-hqc-fifth-algorithm-post-quantum-encryption
6. National Institute of Standards and Technology, "Status Report on the Fourth Round of the NIST Post-Quantum Cryptography Standardization Process," NIST IR 8545, 2025. doi: 10.6028/NIST.IR.8545.
7. OpenSSL Project, "OpenSSL 3.5.0 release notes," Apr. 8, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.openssl.org/news/openssl-3.5-notes.html
8. The Go Project, "Go 1.24 Release Notes," Feb. 2025. [Online]. Available: https://go.dev/doc/go1.24
9. B. Westerbaan, "The state of the post-quantum Internet," Cloudflare Blog, Mar. 2024. [Online]. Available: https://blog.cloudflare.com/pq-2024/
10. B. Westerbaan, "State of the post-quantum Internet in 2025," Cloudflare Blog, Oct. 28, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://blog.cloudflare.com/pq-2025/
11. F. Kammel, "Post-Quantum Cryptography in Kubernetes," Kubernetes Blog, Jul. 18, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://kubernetes.io/blog/2025/07/18/pqc-in-k8s/
12. K. Kwiatkowski, P. Kampanakis, B. E. Westerbaan, and D. Stebila, "Post-quantum hybrid ECDHE-MLKEM Key Agreement for TLSv1.3" (draft-kwiatkowski-tls-ecdhe-mlkem), IETF Internet-Draft, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-kwiatkowski-tls-ecdhe-mlkem/
13. D. J. Bernstein et al., "KyberSlash: Exploiting secret-dependent division timings in Kyber implementations," Dec. 2023. [Online]. Available: https://kyberslash.cr.yp.to/
14. M. Mosca, "Cybersecurity in an era with quantum computers: will we be ready?" IEEE Security & Privacy, vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 38-41, 2018. doi: 10.1109/MSEC.2018.2888779.
15. C. Gidney and M. Ekerå, "How to factor 2048 bit RSA integers in 8 hours using 20 million noisy qubits," Quantum, vol. 5, p. 433, 2021. doi: 10.22331/q-2021-04-15-433.
16. C. Paquin, D. Stebila, and G. Tamvada, "Benchmarking post-quantum cryptography in TLS," in Proc. Int. Conf. on Post-Quantum Cryptography (PQCrypto 2020), LNCS 12100, Springer, 2020. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-64386-8_4.
17. D. Sikeridis, P. Kampanakis, and M. Devetsikiotis, "Post-quantum authentication in TLS 1.3: a performance study," in Proc. 2020 Network and Distributed System Security Symposium (NDSS), 2020. doi: 10.14722/ndss.2020.24203.
18. P. Schwabe, D. Stebila, and T. Wiggers, "Post-quantum TLS without handshake signatures," in Proc. 2020 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security (CCS '20), pp. 1461-1480, 2020. doi: 10.1145/3372297.3423350. [Online]. Available: https://eprint.iacr.org/2020/534
19. E. Rescorla, "The Transport Layer Security (TLS) Protocol Version 1.3," IETF RFC 8446, Aug. 2018. doi: 10.17487/RFC8446.
20. Agence nationale de la sécurité des systèmes d'information (ANSSI), "Views on the post-quantum cryptography transition," Jan. 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.ssi.gouv.fr
21. Bundesamt für Sicherheit in der Informationstechnik (BSI), "Quantum-Safe Cryptography: Fundamentals, Current Developments and Recommendations," 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.bsi.bund.de
22. OpenSSH, "OpenSSH 9.0 release notes," Apr. 2022. [Online]. Available: https://www.openssh.com/txt/release-9.0
23. G. Alagic et al., "Status Report on the Third Round of the NIST Post-Quantum Cryptography Standardization Process," NIST IR 8413, Jul. 2022. doi: 10.6028/NIST.IR.8413.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 The author(s)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
AlphaTech Systems LLC publishes the version of record under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International licence (CC BY 4.0), permitting sharing and adaptation for any purpose with appropriate attribution, a link to the licence, and an indication of changes. The public licence applies upon publication and is irrevocable for compliant users; submission alone does not license unpublished material.