Engineering the Post-Quantum Transition at Scale: Protocol Integration, Library Defaults, and the In-Between Era of Internet Security (2025)

Authors

Keywords:

post-quantum cryptography, ML-KEM, TLS 1.3, OpenSSL 3.5, hybrid key exchange, HQC, FN-DSA, PKI migration, digital trust

Abstract

Background: The August 2024 finalization of FIPS 203, 204, and 205 established the cryptographic core of the post-quantum transition; 2025 was the year that core was engineered into the default path of the Internet . Within twelve months, ML-KEM-based hybrid key exchange became a default, zero-configuration behavior across the major browser engines, a mainstream language runtime (Go 1.24's crypto/mlkem standard-library package), and — decisively for server operators — OpenSSL 3.5.0 (April 2025, LTS), whose default TLS keyshares offer X25519MLKEM768. By late October 2025, more than half of human-initiated traffic observed at a major CDN was post-quantum protected. Objective: This paper characterizes the 2025 state of the post-quantum transition as an engineering achievement, and identifies what the achievement does not yet cover. Methods: Following a design-analytical methodology, we (i) verify the 2025 default-enablement sequence against primary release documentation (OpenSSL, Go, browser engines, platform vendors, CDN telemetry), (ii) analyze the standards pipeline as it stood at year-end (the HQC selection of March 2025; the pending FN-DSA draft; the IR 8547 deprecation schedule), and (iii) construct a residual-risk register mapping six risk classes against six mitigation classes. Results: The deployment achievement is real but asymmetric: confidentiality (key establishment) has moved to post-quantum hybrids at scale, while authentication remains entirely classical — public post-quantum certificates are not expected to be widely issued before 2026 and broadly trusted later. We term this the in-between era and show that it closes the harvest-now-decrypt-later window for transit confidentiality while leaving an open window for identity forgery and server impersonation. The residual-risk register identifies implementation maturity (the KyberSlash-class timing-defect lesson), certificate and PKI latency, and the non-upgradeable long-tail client population as the dominant open risks. Conclusions: The engineering problem of 2025 was enabling post-quantum key exchange by default; the engineering problem of 2026–2027 is post-quantum authentication on the same schedule — and organizations should plan PKI re-issuance, validation pipelines, and legacy-exception registers against that window now.

References

1. National Institute of Standards and Technology, "Module-Lattice-Based Key-Encapsulation Mechanism Standard," FIPS 203, U.S. Dept. of Commerce, Aug. 2024. doi: 10.6028/NIST.FIPS.203.

2. National Institute of Standards and Technology, "Module-Lattice-Based Digital Signature Standard," FIPS 204, U.S. Dept. of Commerce, Aug. 2024. doi: 10.6028/NIST.FIPS.204.

3. National Institute of Standards and Technology, "Stateless Hash-Based Digital Signature Standard," FIPS 205, U.S. Dept. of Commerce, Aug. 2024. doi: 10.6028/NIST.FIPS.205.

4. D. Cooper, D. Apon, Q. Dang, M. Davidson, W. Dworkin, and C. Miller, "Transition to Post-Quantum Cryptography Standards," NIST IR 8547 (Initial Public Draft), Nov. 2024. doi: 10.6028/NIST.IR.8547.ipd.

5. National Institute of Standards and Technology, "NIST Selects HQC as Fifth Algorithm for Post-Quantum Encryption," Mar. 11, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.nist.gov/news-events/news/2025/03/nist-selects-hqc-fifth-algorithm-post-quantum-encryption

6. National Institute of Standards and Technology, "Status Report on the Fourth Round of the NIST Post-Quantum Cryptography Standardization Process," NIST IR 8545, 2025. doi: 10.6028/NIST.IR.8545.

7. OpenSSL Project, "OpenSSL 3.5.0 release notes," Apr. 8, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.openssl.org/news/openssl-3.5-notes.html

8. The Go Project, "Go 1.24 Release Notes," Feb. 2025. [Online]. Available: https://go.dev/doc/go1.24

9. B. Westerbaan, "The state of the post-quantum Internet," Cloudflare Blog, Mar. 2024. [Online]. Available: https://blog.cloudflare.com/pq-2024/

10. B. Westerbaan, "State of the post-quantum Internet in 2025," Cloudflare Blog, Oct. 28, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://blog.cloudflare.com/pq-2025/

11. F. Kammel, "Post-Quantum Cryptography in Kubernetes," Kubernetes Blog, Jul. 18, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://kubernetes.io/blog/2025/07/18/pqc-in-k8s/

12. K. Kwiatkowski, P. Kampanakis, B. E. Westerbaan, and D. Stebila, "Post-quantum hybrid ECDHE-MLKEM Key Agreement for TLSv1.3" (draft-kwiatkowski-tls-ecdhe-mlkem), IETF Internet-Draft, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-kwiatkowski-tls-ecdhe-mlkem/

13. D. J. Bernstein et al., "KyberSlash: Exploiting secret-dependent division timings in Kyber implementations," Dec. 2023. [Online]. Available: https://kyberslash.cr.yp.to/

14. M. Mosca, "Cybersecurity in an era with quantum computers: will we be ready?" IEEE Security & Privacy, vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 38-41, 2018. doi: 10.1109/MSEC.2018.2888779.

15. C. Gidney and M. Ekerå, "How to factor 2048 bit RSA integers in 8 hours using 20 million noisy qubits," Quantum, vol. 5, p. 433, 2021. doi: 10.22331/q-2021-04-15-433.

16. C. Paquin, D. Stebila, and G. Tamvada, "Benchmarking post-quantum cryptography in TLS," in Proc. Int. Conf. on Post-Quantum Cryptography (PQCrypto 2020), LNCS 12100, Springer, 2020. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-64386-8_4.

17. D. Sikeridis, P. Kampanakis, and M. Devetsikiotis, "Post-quantum authentication in TLS 1.3: a performance study," in Proc. 2020 Network and Distributed System Security Symposium (NDSS), 2020. doi: 10.14722/ndss.2020.24203.

18. P. Schwabe, D. Stebila, and T. Wiggers, "Post-quantum TLS without handshake signatures," in Proc. 2020 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security (CCS '20), pp. 1461-1480, 2020. doi: 10.1145/3372297.3423350. [Online]. Available: https://eprint.iacr.org/2020/534

19. E. Rescorla, "The Transport Layer Security (TLS) Protocol Version 1.3," IETF RFC 8446, Aug. 2018. doi: 10.17487/RFC8446.

20. Agence nationale de la sécurité des systèmes d'information (ANSSI), "Views on the post-quantum cryptography transition," Jan. 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.ssi.gouv.fr

21. Bundesamt für Sicherheit in der Informationstechnik (BSI), "Quantum-Safe Cryptography: Fundamentals, Current Developments and Recommendations," 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.bsi.bund.de

22. OpenSSH, "OpenSSH 9.0 release notes," Apr. 2022. [Online]. Available: https://www.openssh.com/txt/release-9.0

23. G. Alagic et al., "Status Report on the Third Round of the NIST Post-Quantum Cryptography Standardization Process," NIST IR 8413, Jul. 2022. doi: 10.6028/NIST.IR.8413.

Downloads

Published

2026-10-29